Hot News
| The investigation conducted on Fakir Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Dış Ticaret AŞ concluded through the settlement and commitments procedures. | 23.6.2025 | ||
| The investigation launched with the Competition Board (Board) decision dated 20.02.2025 and 25-07/177-M(2) in order to determine if Fakir Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Dış Ticaret AŞ’nin (FAKİR) violated Article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition (Act no 4054) by intervening in the sale prices of resellers and restricting online sales as well as by facilitating the indirect exchange of information between Teknosa İç ve Dış Tic. AŞ, Vatan Bilgisayar San. ve Tic. AŞ and Media Markt Tur... | |||
| Read | |||
| A decision to open an investigation on the Economic Unity Composed of Alphabet Inc., Google Ireland Limited, Google LLC, Google International LLC and Google Reklamcılık ve Pazarlama Ltd. Şti (GOOGLE) taken | 20.6.2025 | ||
| An investigation has been opened about GOOGLE in order to determine whether GOOGLE violated the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition (the Act no 4054) according to article 41 of the same Act. The subject of the investigation is the claims that GOOGLE violated article 6 of the Act no 4054 by transferring its power in online search advertising services to other online advertising services via Performance Max (PMAX) campaign, which is a type of campaign in Google Ads, by engaging in expl... | |||
| Read | |||
| The investigation about Vatan Bilgisayar San. ve Tic. (Vatan) ended with settlement procedure | 19.6.2025 | ||
| The investigation, which was initiated with the decision of the Competition Board (the Board) dated 20.02.2025 and numbered 25-07/177-M(2) to determine whether article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition was violated by means of an indirect information exchange among Vatan Bilgisayar San. ve Tic. AŞ, Teknosa İç ve Dış Tic. AŞ and Media Markt Turkey Tic. Ltd. Şti. through Fakir Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Dış Ticaret AŞ., has ended with settlement procedure with regard to Vatan. ... | |||
| Read | |||
| The investigation about certain food control laboratories concluded | 17.6.2025 | ||
| The investigation, which was conducted according to the Competition Board decision dated 30.11.2023 and numbered 23-55/1085-M about Veltıa Laboratuvar ve Danışmanlık Hizmetleri AŞ (STA Kalite Kontrol Gıda Laboratuvarı AŞ), Radix Analiz Laboratuvar Hizmetleri Ticaret AŞ, Kalite Sistem Laboratuvarları AŞ, Çevre Endüstriyel Analiz San. ve Tic. AŞ and Southern Agricultural Services Tarım Ltd. Şti. concerning the claims that they fixed prices and exchanged competitively sensitive information, has bee... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation about Teknosa İç ve Dış Tic. AŞ ended with settlement procedure. | 16.6.2025 | ||
| The investigation, which was initiated with the decision of the Competition Board (the Board) dated 20.02.2025 and numbered 25-07/177-M(2) to determine whether article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition was violated by means of an indirect information exchange among Vatan Bilgisayar San. ve Tic. AŞ, Teknosa İç ve Dış Tic. AŞ (Teknosa) and Media Markt Turkey Tic. Ltd. Şti. through Fakir Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Dış Ticaret AŞ has ended with settlement procedure with regard to Tek... | |||
| Read | |||
| The investigation about certain undertakings operating in the production of ready-mixed concrete in Ankara concluded | 12.6.2025 | ||
| The investigation conducted to determine whether certain ready-mixed concrete producers operating in Ankara violated article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition (the Act no 4054) in the labor market has been concluded. As a result of discussing the file on 15.05.2025, the Competition Board decided that The undertakings with the commercial titles Güven Grup Hazır Beton Hafriyat İnşaat Madencilik Petrol Nakliyat Ticaret Limited Şirketi (GÜVEN), Kandemir Beton İnşaat Nakl... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation Launched on Coca-Cola Satış ve Dağıtım AŞ | 10.6.2025 | ||
| Investigation Launched on Coca-Cola Satış ve Dağıtım AŞ The Competition Board (Board) concluded the preliminary inquiry conducted into the allegations that Coca-Cola Satış ve Dağıtım AŞ (CCSD) violated the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition by imposing exclusivity on retail outlets and excluding competitors from outlets. After examining the information and documents acquired and the observations made during the preliminary inquiry in its meeting of 22.04.2025, the Competition Bo... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation launched on seven undertakings operating in the seed market | 4.6.2025 | ||
| The Competition Board (the Board) concluded the preliminary inquiry conducted about the claim that undertakings operating in field crops seed sector violated article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition (the Act no 4054) by means of allocation of territories/customers and exchanging competitively sensitive information. Having discussed the information, documents acquired and observations made in the preliminary inquiry in its meeting on 22.05.2025, the Board considered the evi... | |||
| Read | |||
| The investigation about certain undertakings operating in the production and sale of cement, ready-mixed concrete and aggregate in Malatya concluded | 2.6.2025 | ||
| The Competition Board decided that administrative fines should be imposed on ACEMOĞULLARI, on the economic unity composed of BETONTEK and NORM MADEN, as well as on ÇİMYA, KABET, ÇİMBETON, ÇINARLA and MABETAŞ. It was also decided that imposing administrative fines on ÇİMKO, ERVA and RECYDİA was unnecessary since there were no findings to indicate that these companies violated Article 4 of the Act no 4054 in the market for the production and sales of ready-mixed concrete. Click here for the tex... | |||
| Read | |||
| Investigation conducted on Arzum Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (ARZUM) concluded with the settlement and commitments procedures. | 30.5.2025 | ||
| Launched with the Competition Board decision dated 20.02.2025 and numbered 25-07/177-M(1), the investigation on Arzum Elektrikli Ev Aletleri Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (ARZUM) was intended to determine if the undertaking violated Article 4 of the Act no 4054 on the Protection of Competition by intervening in the sale prices of resellers and preventing its distributors from making active and passive sales to those resellers ARZUM directly sells to, and it has been concluded through the settlement and c... | |||
| Read | |||